PUBLIKATIONSSERVER

Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Social Discrimination: Meta-Analytical Evidence

T. Buhl, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2 (1999) 51–58.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Artikel | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Autor*in
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to supply quantitative information that is useful for planning studies that investigate social discrimination on differently valued scales with newly created groups. Meta-analyses of the amount of in-group favoritism were conducted with the valence of the scale as moderator (k = 52). Additionally, the experimental effect of valence on the size of in-group bias was analyzed (k = 26). In-group favoritism in the minimal group paradigm is greater when participants are asked to make evaluations on positively valued attributes or to allocate positive resources than when they are asked to make evaluations on negatively valued attributes or to allocate negative resources. Nevertheless, there is also in-group favoritism in the negative domain. The analyses indicate that the difference between positive and negative valence conditions is especially striking when resources are allocated between in-group and out-group or when minority members are making decisions.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Band
2
Zeitschriftennummer
1
Seite
51-58
ISSN
eISSN
FH-PUB-ID

Zitieren

Buhl, Thomas: Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Social Discrimination: Meta-Analytical Evidence. In: Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Bd. 2, SAGE Publications (1999), Nr. 1, S. 51–58
Buhl T. Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Social Discrimination: Meta-Analytical Evidence. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 1999;2(1):51-58. doi:10.1177/1368430299021004
Buhl, T. (1999). Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Social Discrimination: Meta-Analytical Evidence. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430299021004
@article{Buhl_1999, title={Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Social Discrimination: Meta-Analytical Evidence}, volume={2}, DOI={10.1177/1368430299021004}, number={1}, journal={Group Processes & Intergroup Relations}, publisher={SAGE Publications}, author={Buhl, Thomas}, year={1999}, pages={51–58} }
Buhl, Thomas. “Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Social Discrimination: Meta-Analytical Evidence.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2, no. 1 (1999): 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430299021004.
T. Buhl, “Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Social Discrimination: Meta-Analytical Evidence,” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 1999.
Buhl, Thomas. “Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Social Discrimination: Meta-Analytical Evidence.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, vol. 2, no. 1, SAGE Publications, 1999, pp. 51–58, doi:10.1177/1368430299021004.

Export

Markierte Publikationen

Open Data LibreCat

Suchen in

Google Scholar